An oil terminal fire in Misurata, Libya, in May.

Potential investors often wonder is better to go with a big-name company. Shouldn’t bigger investment firms give better advice? After all, they are big, powerful, and knowledgeable – the best of the best, right? But what is the outcome of their work?

Baltimore-based investment giant Legg Mason managed $300 million for a Libyan investment fund (New York Times article). From January 2009 through September 2010, Legg Mason charged their big client $27 million in fees. But Legg Mason did a lousy job losing 40% during this time period! This is yet another example of Wall Street making tons of money regardless of how they perform.  People were paid millions of dollars in fees and delivered sub-par returns.

How did the little guys do for comparison? At NorthStar Capital Advisors, our relatively conservative portfolio of 50% stocks and 50% bonds gained 16% from January 2009 through September 2010.

Instead of being swayed by the slick marketing and unrealistic expectations often created by large well-known firms, most investors would be better off with a balanced portfolio of stocks and bonds with reasonable rates of returns.

NorthStar Capital Advisors is not a big, famous firm.  We offer simple advice and don’t require huge fees.  We help individual investors invest relatively small amounts (no $300M accounts here!).  We believe we’re doing better work for our clients than those bigger firms.

Bigger is not necessarily better when it comes to investing.  In fact, it’s often just the opposite.

Did you know that insider trading laws do NOT apply to members of Congress? It is completely legal for them to buy and sell stocks based on non-public information learned through their congressional activities.

Members of congress have daily access to non-public information. For example, say you serve on the health care committee which decides that Medicare is not going to pay for a certain type of drug. That’s market moving information. You can trade on this before it’s public knowledge and do so legally.

During the health care debate of 2009, members of congress were trading health care stocks and making money this way. During the financial crisis of 2008, members of congress got private notifications of the potentially apocalyptic outcomes. In the melt down, it was revealed that Spencer Bachus of Alabama, the Head of the Financial Services Committee in the House of Representatives today, shorted stocks after a meeting and profited handsomely from it. Here’s how Andrew Brietbart described it:

While Congressman Bachus was publicly trying to keep the economy from cratering, he was privately betting that it would, buying option funds that would go up in value if the market went down. He would make a variety of trades and profited at a time when most Americans were losing their shirts.

60 Minutes profiled insider trading in Congress. Watch it and you’ll be shocked and outraged.

Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., introduced the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act of 2011, which would prohibit members or employees of Congress, as well as executive branch employees, from using non-public information obtained through their public service for investing or any attempt at personal financial gain. But don’t expect this to go anywhere. Why would the rule makers take away such a profitable option from themselves?

During the housing boom, Carl Richards, a financial adviser, made the same mistakes he warns people to avoid.  A bad combination of leverage and wishful thinking led to the Richards Family losing their home.  According to Carl, “I should have known better.”  The New York Times story written by Carl is a must-read.