July 2017 - NorthStar Capital Advisors

Know More, Make More

A ground-breaking academic study finds that more financially knowledgeable people earn a higher return on their 401(k) retirement savings.

Dr Robert Clark (NC State University), Dr. Annamaria Lusardi (George Washington University), and Dr. Olivia Mitchell (University of Pennsylvania) analyzed a unique dataset that combined 401(k) performance data for 20,000 employees plus financial literacy data for the same workers.

Investors deemed to be more financially knowledgeable than peers enjoyed an estimated 1.3% higher annual return in their 401(k)s or other defined contribution plans than those with less knowledge.

According to the study’s authors:
“We show that more financially knowledgeable employees are also significantly more likely to hold stocks in their 401(k) plan portfolios. They can also anticipate significantly higher expected excess returns, which over a 30-year working career could build a retirement fund 25% larger than that of their less-knowledgeable peers.”

Financially savvy people tend to save more and are more likely to invest those savings in the stock market. But past studies haven’t clearly demonstrated that these people necessarily make better investment decisions. The authors look at patterns in 401(k) retirement accounts and find that more sophisticated investors do indeed get better returns on their savings.

Source: “Financial Knowledge and 401(k) Investment Performance”

Rebalancing is Important

An investment portfolio must be periodically rebalanced back to its original targets to maintain the intended risk level and asset allocations (i.e., mix of stocks and bonds).

Drifting Through Time
Say you started out with a portfolio of 50% stocks and 50% bonds at age 21. Stocks go up 2 out of 3 years on average. By the time you’re 50 your portfolio mix could drift to 90% stocks and 10% bonds. That’s quite out of balance!

In rebalancing, we would sell the “excess” of stocks and use the proceeds to purchase bonds. In doing so, we ensure that we sell investments at a relatively high prices and buy investments at a low price.

Effects of Rebalancing
In a balanced portfolio of stocks and bonds, you will typically be selling stocks and buying bonds when you rebalance. You will be removing excess volatility from the outsized stock allocation and going back to your initial combination of stocks and bonds.

Quarterly or Annually — Which is better?
In a taxable account, there is a tax benefit for waiting more than a year to rebalance. In a non-taxable account, quarterly rebalancing can have some advantages. You probably don’t want to rebalance on shorter time periods because you need to give your strong-performing investments time to run and avoid the potential costs of excess transactions.

Easy Rebalancing
Is it possible to set up automatic rebalancing? One way is to work with a professional money manager like NorthStar. We do this for our clients. Big firms like Vanguard usually don’t have an automatic option, but they say they will spend 15 to 30 minutes on the phone with customers to help walk through the process and get rebalanced.

Great Expectations

Expectations are very important. If you know what to expect, you shouldn’t be surprised. And if you’re not surprised, you won’t panic.

Coaching clients on what to expect and how (not) to respond to extraneous events is our defining role as a trusted advisor.

We invest in stocks because of their superior returns. Those historically higher returns are a reward for tolerating volatility (i.e., the “volatility premium”). But what does stock volatility look like in the real world? What pattern of price variability should we expect?

Well, here it is in its most elegant of graphical forms (click image for a bigger view).

Here’s how to read this chart:

The intra-year decline versus the annual return of the S&P 500 are plotted vertically with years running horizontally from 1980 through year-to-date 2017.
The annual return (grey bars) show the calendar year price increase. For example, in 1980 stocks climbed 26% for the year.
The intra-year decline (red dots) is the largest market drop from peak to trough during that year. For example, in 1980 we experienced a 17% drawdown.
Putting these together, in 1980 the stock market dipped 17% before closing up 26% by the end of the year.

It’s not hard to see that short, intra-year declines are the norm.

In fact, the average intra-year drop is 14.1%. But despite these temporary declines, the annual returns are positive in 28 of 37 years (76% of the time). During the charted time period 1980 to 2016 the average annual return was 8.5% This pattern is persistent. If you look back to 1946, the average drawdown is a remarkably close 13.8%, and the price return was positive 50 of the 71 years (70% of the time).

History shows the declines are temporary, the advance is permanent.

Think about how the average person responds to these intra-year declines. The financial media is screaming about the crisis du jour which is consistently characterized as the end of the world (“I’ve lived through some terrible things in my life, some of which have actually happened.” — Mark Twain ). Data shows the average investor, without the support of a caring, empathetic coach/advisor, consistently sells at the worst of times – i.e., during one of these perfectly normal and temporary pullbacks.

Volatility does not equal a financial loss unless you sell.

In our humble opinion, possessing an informed expectation, one that allows you to ignore short-term gyrations to capture long-term gains, is a Great Expectation.

Sir Isaac Newton: Monumental Scientist, Terrible Investor

Most people recognize Sir Isaac Newton as one of the most influential scientists of all time, but did you know he was a horrible investor?

Newton’s experience with the South Sea Company vividly demonstrates the financial perils of chasing hot markets, getting caught up in investment bubbles, and not maintaining a diversified portfolio.

In the early 18th century the South Sea Company was established and given a monopoly on trade in the South Seas in return for assuming England’s war debt. Investors liked the idea of that monopoly and the company’s stock began to take off.

Newton hear the siren call of the South Sea Company, invested his cash in early 1720 and managed to turn a nice profit. But then the stock kept soaring after he had gotten out. So Newton jumped back into the stock with a lot more money than his original investment.

Newton subsequently lost 20,000 pounds, almost all of his life savings! From this terrible outcome, Newton supposedly decreed, “I can calculate the movement of the stars, but not the madness of men.”

No warning on Earth can save people determined to grow suddenly rich.
— Lord Overstone

Source: Sovereign Man

Know More, Make More

Rebalancing is Important

Great Expectations

Sir Isaac Newton: Monumental Scientist, Terrible Investor

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories