October 2017 - NorthStar Capital Advisors

Top 10 Mistakes Made with Beneficiary Designations

#1 — Not Naming a Beneficiary
By not naming a beneficiary you have most likely guaranteed that the asset will go through probate upon your death.

#2 — Not Designating Contingent Beneficiaries
If your primary beneficiary predeceases or dies at the same time as you, you’re subject to the same consequences as #1

#3 — Failing to Keep Beneficiary Designations Up-to-Date
If you get divorced, it’s essential you immediately review and update all beneficiary designations.

#4 — Naming Minors as Direct Beneficiaries
Trusts are often established to delay the time a survivor receives an asset until they are old enough to make good money decisions. However, if you designate a minor child as an account’s beneficiary and there’s also a testamentary trust, the designation trumps the trust and the child will receive the assets immediately.

#5 — Naming Special Needs Individuals as Direct Beneficiaries
Naming a “special needs” individual as the direct beneficiary could unintentionally disqualify that individual from receiving his or her valuable governmental benefits.

#6 — Naming Financially Irresponsible Beneficiaries
Often it’s better to create a lifetime “spendthrift trust” to hold the inheritance for the benefit of the individual for his or her lifetime while protecting the assets from creditors.

#7 — Naming Direct Beneficiaries on All Assets Other than Real Estate
Very often real estate will need to go through probate even if there’s a will in place. This process can take a year or longer during which the estate is responsible for paying for maintenance, taxes, etc. It’s generally advisable to allow your cash accounts and/or life insurance proceeds to go through probate so the estate will have sufficient funds to support the real estate during probate.

#8 — Naming Multiple Beneficiaries on a Transfer on Death Deed
Avoid doing because all beneficiaries must agree on the realtor, sale price, and maintenance costs until the property is sold. Getting that type of agreement is very difficult.

#9 — Naming a Child as Co-Owner of a Deposit or Investment Account
Aging parents will sometimes add a trusted adult child as the co-owner of his or her bank account. Avoid this because it can create complicated issues around gifting, creditor issues, and final expenses.

#10 — Naming One Child as the Sole Beneficiary of a Life Insurance Policy or Deposit Account
A parent with multiple adult children should avoid doing this because it can create a situation very similar to #9.

Source: AAII

Asset Allocation in Thirty Seconds

If you’ve only got 30 seconds to understand asset allocation, spend those precious seconds staring at the table below. The main takeaway: stocks beat Treasury bonds and T-Bills on average. For example, over a 1-year period, stocks outperform 61.3% of the time during the last 210 years. Over a longer 30-year period (typical for retirement portfolios) stocks came out on top 91.2% of the time.

This table is from Jeremy Seigel’s book, Stocks for the Long Run.

7 Fatal Flaws in 401(k) Plans

Paul Merriman writes about seven fatal flaws in America’s 401(k) plans:

#1 Restricted Access
The first and biggest flaw in 401(k) plans is restricted access to the best investment choices

#2 Participation not required
I believe that many American households, with nothing saved for retirement, are headed by employed breadwinners who could participate in a 401(k) retirement plan

#3 Insufficient employer match
I also think employers should be required to match at least a quarter of what each employee contributes — after the waiting period, of course.

#4 Employees bear the costs
Many employers make their workers pay the costs of administering a 401(k) plan, which should be treated as an employee benefit that’s paid for by the company. In far too many cases, the costs paid by employees are hidden in the form of higher fees for investment funds.

#5 No Rollover IRA option
Federal law allows — but doesn’t require — employers to let employees move part or all of their 401(k) balances into a Rollover IRA while continuing to contribute to the company plan. All workers should have this option, which gives them access to virtually unlimited investment choices.

#6 Too much company stock
Corporate 401(K) plans often encourage participants to load up on company stock. There’s probably no way to stop this short of a federal law, because employers with publicly-traded stock love the steady market that’s created for their shares every payday.

#7 Default options are too safe
Too many plans steer contributions to low-performance investments. It’s bad enough that the employee’s default option in many plans is simply not to participate. But for those who do sign up, it’s equally wrong to have a default option of a stable value fund that virtually guarantees the employee will gradually lose some of the purchasing power of their savings.

Chasing Past Performance is Expensive

A rigorous study from Vanguard demonstrates that chasing the hot mutual fund is an inferior investing strategy compared to good, old-fashioned buy and hold.

Vanguard analyzed a decade of data ending December 31, 2013 across nine asset classes. In every case the investor would have been significantly better off just sticking with the index. On average the indexes generated 50% higher returns than the performance-chasing strategy!

Buy and hold may not be perfect, but it can be a lot better than flitting from mutual fund to mutual fund.

Top 10 Mistakes Made with Beneficiary Designations

Asset Allocation in Thirty Seconds

7 Fatal Flaws in 401(k) Plans

Chasing Past Performance is Expensive

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories