NorthStar Capital AdvisorsNorthStar Capital AdvisorsNorthStar Capital AdvisorsNorthStar Capital Advisors
Start Here
  • How We Help
  • Who We Serve
  • Who We Are
  • Fiduciary
  • Learning
  • Start Here
  • How We Help
  • Who We Serve
  • Who We Are
  • Fiduciary
  • Learning
  • Start Here

Top 10 Mistakes Made with Beneficiary Designations

  • October 26, 2017/
  • Posted By : admin/
  • 0 comments /
  • Under : Behavior, Best Practices, Retirement

beneficiary form#1 — Not Naming a Beneficiary
By not naming a beneficiary you have most likely guaranteed that the asset will go through probate upon your death.

#2 — Not Designating Contingent Beneficiaries
If your primary beneficiary predeceases or dies at the same time as you, you’re subject to the same consequences as #1

#3 — Failing to Keep Beneficiary Designations Up-to-Date
If you get divorced, it’s essential you immediately review and update all beneficiary designations.

#4 — Naming Minors as Direct Beneficiaries
Trusts are often established to delay the time a survivor receives an asset until they are old enough to make good money decisions.  However, if you designate a minor child as an account’s beneficiary and there’s also a testamentary trust, the designation trumps the trust and the child will receive the assets immediately.

#5 — Naming Special Needs Individuals as Direct Beneficiaries
Naming a “special needs” individual as the direct beneficiary could unintentionally disqualify that individual from receiving his or her valuable governmental benefits.

#6 — Naming Financially Irresponsible Beneficiaries
Often it’s better to create a lifetime “spendthrift trust” to hold the inheritance for the benefit of the individual for his or her lifetime while protecting the assets from creditors.

#7 — Naming Direct Beneficiaries on All Assets Other than Real Estate
Very often real estate will need to go through probate even if there’s a will in place.  This process can take a year or longer during which the estate is responsible for paying for maintenance, taxes, etc.  It’s generally advisable to allow your cash accounts and/or life insurance proceeds to go through probate so the estate will have sufficient funds to support the real estate during probate.

#8 — Naming Multiple Beneficiaries on a Transfer on Death Deed
Avoid doing because all beneficiaries must agree on the realtor, sale price, and maintenance costs until the property is sold.  Getting that type of agreement is very difficult.

#9 — Naming a Child as Co-Owner of a Deposit or Investment Account
Aging parents will sometimes add a trusted adult child as the co-owner of his or her bank account.  Avoid this because it can create complicated issues around gifting, creditor issues,  and final expenses.

#10 — Naming One Child as the Sole Beneficiary of a Life Insurance Policy or Deposit Account
A parent with multiple adult children should avoid doing this because it can create a situation very similar to #9.

Source: AAII


Asset Allocation in Thirty Seconds

  • October 19, 2017/
  • Posted By : admin/
  • 0 comments /
  • Under : Investing 101

If you’ve only got 30 seconds to understand asset allocation, spend those precious seconds staring at the table below.  The main takeaway: stocks beat Treasury bonds and T-Bills on average.  For example, over a 1-year period, stocks outperform 61.3% of the time during the last 210 years.  Over a longer 30-year period (typical for retirement portfolios) stocks came out on top 91.2% of the time.

stocks-bondsThis table is from Jeremy Seigel’s book, Stocks for the Long Run.


7 Fatal Flaws in 401(k) Plans

  • October 12, 2017/
  • Posted By : admin/
  • 0 comments /
  • Under : 401(k), Retirement

USmapPaul Merriman writes about seven fatal flaws in America’s 401(k) plans:

#1 Restricted Access
The first and biggest flaw in 401(k) plans is restricted access to the best investment choices

#2 Participation not required
I believe that many American households, with nothing saved for retirement, are headed by employed breadwinners who could participate in a 401(k) retirement plan

#3 Insufficient employer match
I also think employers should be required to match at least a quarter of what each employee contributes — after the waiting period, of course.

#4 Employees bear the costs
Many employers make their workers pay the costs of administering a 401(k) plan, which should be treated as an employee benefit that’s paid for by the company. In far too many cases, the costs paid by employees are hidden in the form of higher fees for investment funds.

#5 No Rollover IRA option
Federal law allows — but doesn’t require — employers to let employees move part or all of their 401(k) balances into a Rollover IRA while continuing to contribute to the company plan. All workers should have this option, which gives them access to virtually unlimited investment choices.

#6 Too much company stock

Corporate 401(K) plans often encourage participants to load up on company stock. There’s probably no way to stop this short of a federal law, because employers with publicly-traded stock love the steady market that’s created for their shares every payday.

#7 Default options are too safe
Too many plans steer contributions to low-performance investments. It’s bad enough that the employee’s default option in many plans is simply not to participate. But for those who do sign up, it’s equally wrong to have a default option of a stable value fund that virtually guarantees the employee will gradually lose some of the purchasing power of their savings.


Chasing Past Performance is Expensive

  • October 5, 2017/
  • Posted By : admin/
  • 0 comments /
  • Under : Behavior, Best Practices, Mutual Funds, Performance, Seeking Prudent Advice

A rigorous study from Vanguard  demonstrates that chasing the hot mutual fund is an inferior investing strategy compared to good, old-fashioned buy and hold.

Vanguard analyzed a decade of data ending December 31, 2013 across nine asset classes.  In every case the investor would have been significantly better off just sticking with the index.  On average the indexes generated 50% higher returns than the performance-chasing strategy!

Buy and hold may not be perfect, but it can be a lot better than flitting from mutual fund to mutual fund.

 


Recent Posts
  • SVB and bank collapses March 14,2023
  • 529 Rollovers (coming soon) February 6,2023
  • SECURE Act 2.0 (2023 changes inside) January 5,2023
  • Time-sensitive planning (action needed) November 2,2022
  • Market lessons you should know (inside) October 18,2022
Archives
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
Categories
  • 401(k)
  • Annuities
  • Behavior
  • Best Practices
  • Bonds
  • Charitable Donations
  • Economy
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary
  • Financial Planning
  • Investing 101
  • Live Well
  • Market Outlook
  • Mutual Funds
  • NorthStar
  • Performance
  • Personal Finance
  • Planning
  • Retirement
  • Saving Money
  • Scams & Schemes
  • Seeking Prudent Advice
  • Tax Planning
  • Uncategorised
  • Uncategorized
  • Weekly Market Review
ABOUT US

We are a fee-only, independent fiduciary advisor. Our allegiance rests solely with our clients and their best interests. We are headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina and serve client families across the nation.



CLIENT TOOLS
CONTACT
  • (704) 350-5028
  • info@nstarcapital.com
  • 521 East Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28203
    (by appointment only)
  • fax: (704) 626-3462
FROM OUR BLOG
  • SVB and bank collapses March 14,2023
  • 529 Rollovers (coming soon) February 6,2023
  • SECURE Act 2.0 (2023 changes inside) January 5,2023
Nothing on this website constitutes either the provision of investment advice or solicitation to provide investment advice. Investment advice can only be provided through a formal investment advisory relationship. Copyright © 2023 NorthStar Capital Advisors - Charlotte, NC. All Rights Reserved.